Open interactive comparison
ChinaCache vs Fastly: CDN Performance Comparison
Compare ChinaCache vs Fastly. Current page data shows Fastly has the lowest P50 latency (41ms), while ChinaCache has the highest uptime (99.81%). Review latency, uptime, throughput, sample size, and security capabilities side by side.
Data updated: 9/3/2026, 18:51:05
CDNs in this comparison
Core metric comparison
| Metric | ChinaCache | Fastly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 75 | 79 |
| P50 latency | 75.57ms | 41ms |
| P95 latency | 112.94ms | 58.25ms |
| Uptime | 99.81% | 99.72% |
| P50 throughput | 145.24 Mbps | 137.07 Mbps |
| Security score | 50 | 50 |
| HTTP/3 | ||
| Samples | 5,950 | 4,440 |
| Pricing model | Enterprise contract / Price on request | Pay-as-you-go |
Data notes and methodology
The comparison results are generated using unified metric definitions; the data update time, sample size, and missing items will be clearly displayed on the page.
This page retains the latest result that met the publication criteria and is replaced only by newer qualifying data.