Open interactive comparison
ChinaCache vs Huawei Cloud vs Kingsoft Cloud: CDN Performance Comparison
Compare ChinaCache vs Huawei Cloud vs Kingsoft Cloud. Current page data shows Huawei Cloud has the lowest P50 latency (69.57ms), while ChinaCache has the highest uptime (99.81%). Review latency, uptime, throughput, sample size, and security capabilities side by side.
Data updated: 9/13/2026, 10:47:19
CDNs in this comparison
Core metric comparison
| Metric | ChinaCache | Huawei Cloud CDN | Kingsoft Cloud CDN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 75 | 77 | 73 |
| P50 latency | 75.57ms | 69.57ms | 80.57ms |
| P95 latency | 112.94ms | 98.62ms | 114.27ms |
| Uptime | 99.81% | 99.75% | 99.67% |
| P50 throughput | 145.24 Mbps | 165.63 Mbps | 125.24 Mbps |
| Security score | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| HTTP/3 | |||
| Samples | 5,950 | 1,870 | 6,732 |
| Pricing model | Enterprise contract / Price on request | Pay-as-you-go / Bandwidth billing | Pay-as-you-go / bandwidth-based billing |
Data notes and methodology
Comparison results are generated using a unified set of metrics; data update time, sample size, and missing items are explicitly shown on the page.
This page retains the latest result that met the publication criteria and is replaced only by newer qualifying data.