Open interactive comparison
ChinaCache vs Kingsoft Cloud: CDN Performance Comparison
Compare ChinaCache vs Kingsoft Cloud. Current page data shows ChinaCache has the lowest P50 latency (75.57ms), while ChinaCache has the highest uptime (99.81%). Review latency, uptime, throughput, sample size, and security capabilities side by side.
Data updated: 9/12/2026, 10:53:46
CDNs in this comparison
Core metric comparison
| Metric | ChinaCache | Kingsoft Cloud CDN |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 75 | 73 |
| P50 latency | 75.57ms | 80.57ms |
| P95 latency | 112.94ms | 114.27ms |
| Uptime | 99.81% | 99.67% |
| P50 throughput | 145.24 Mbps | 125.24 Mbps |
| Security score | 50 | 50 |
| HTTP/3 | ||
| Samples | 5,950 | 6,732 |
| Pricing model | Enterprise contract / Price on request | Pay-as-you-go / bandwidth-based billing |
Data notes and methodology
Comparison results are generated according to a unified metric definition; data update time, sample size, and missing items are clearly displayed on the page.
This page retains the latest result that met the publication criteria and is replaced only by newer qualifying data.