CDN Comparison
Compare up to five CDN providers side by side. This page uses the latest real platform snapshot for candidates, sample size and trend data.
Candidate Providers
61
Mainland China 9 / Global 52
24h Samples
228,359
Updated 9/24/2026, 11:52:24
Selected Providers
5
Selected chinacache, huawei, kingsoft-cloud, tencent, volcengine
Current Leader
Huawei Cloud CDN
Overall Score 77
Average P50 Latency
73.8ms
Average across selected providers
Average Uptime
99.7%
Average across selected providers
Compare Status
Synced
Refreshes automatically after selection changes
Latency trend comparison
Last 24 hours · P50 latency (ms)
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 75 | 77 | 73 | 76 | 76 |
| Latency P50 | 75.57ms | 69.57ms | 80.57ms | 73.57ms | 69.57ms |
| Latency P95 | 112.94ms | 98.62ms | 114.27ms | 103.64ms | 101.48ms |
| Uptime | 99.81% | 99.75% | 99.67% | 99.71% | 99.74% |
| Throughput P50 | 145.24 Mbps | 165.63 Mbps | 125.24 Mbps | 175.47 Mbps | 155.94 Mbps |
| Security (Measured) | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| HTTP/3 | |||||
| Pricing | Enterprise contract / Price on request | Pay-as-you-go / Bandwidth billing | Pay-as-you-go / bandwidth-based billing | Pay-as-you-go / Bandwidth-based billing | Pay-as-you-go / bandwidth billing |